No TRUE Bible-Believing Christian, WHOSE
UNDERSTANDING HAS BEEN OPENED, would ever support the
killing of those who practice fornication or adultery or same-sex sexual intercourse,
since the Lord Jesus Christ makes it very clear that He “is not come to destroy men’s lives, but
to save them”.
The Lord Jesus Christ
effectively, under the New Testament, disallows putting anyone to physical death
for breaking God’s commandments:
Luke 9:
54 And when his disciples James and John saw this,
they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and
consume them, even as Elias did?
55 But he turned, and rebuked them,
and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
56 For the Son of man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but
to save them.
And they went to another village.
It is therefore an irony that, as a result of the Homosexual
advocacy subtle, but aggressive, manipulation of Public Opinion and the
equality laws, while more and more Bible-Believing
Christians are being victimised in one form or the other, an
attempt is being made to give the impression that homosexuals are at risk of
being killed by Bible-Believing Christians.
With all respect, I believe I have already, biblically,
addressed all the relevant issues and will therefore NO
LONGER CONTINUE THESE COMMUNICATIONS, since I believe there is a deliberate
effort being made to force
these communications to continue as long as possible to “benumb raw
sensitivities about homosexuality” as part of the Homosexual advocacy
strategy that was CLEARLY outlined AS FAR BACK AS November 1987, by Marshall Kirk and Erastes
Pill (THE OVERHAULING OF STRAIGHT AMERICA - http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm ):
[1] TALK
ABOUT GAYS AND GAYNESS AS LOUDLY AND AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE.
The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior
begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and
among your acquaintances. The acceptability of the new behavior
will ultimately hinge on the number of one's fellows doing it or accepting it.
One may be offended by its novelty at first--many, in times past, were
momentarily scandalized by "streaking,'' eating goldfish, and premarital
sex. But as long as Joe Six-pack feels little pressure to perform likewise, and
as long as the behavior in question presents little
threat to his physical and financial security, he soon gets used to it and life
goes on. The skeptic may still shake his head and
think "people arc crazy these days," but
over time his objections are likely to become more reflective, more
philosophical, less emotional.
The way to benumb raw
sensitivities about homosexuality is to have a lot of people talk a great deal about the subject
in a neutral or supportive way. Open and frank talk makes the subject seem less
furtive, alien, and sinful, more above-board. Constant talk builds the
impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that
a sizable segment accepts or even practices homosexuality. Even rancorous
debates between opponents and defenders serve the purpose of desensitization so
long as "respectable" gays are front and center
to make their own pitch. The main thing is to talk about gayness until the
issue becomes thoroughly tiresome.
And when we say talk about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early
stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be
shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior
itself. Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should
be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the
camel get his nose inside the tent--only later his unsightly derriere!
Where we talk is important. The visual media, film and television, are plainly
the most powerful image-makers in Western civilization. The average American
household watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open up a gateway
into the private world of straights, through which a Trojan horse might be
passed. As far as desensitization is concerned, the medium is the message--of
normalcy. So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best covert weapon in the
battle to desensitize the mainstream. Bit by bit over the past ten years, gay
characters and gay themes have been introduced into TV programs and films
(though often this has been done to achieve comedic and ridiculous affects). On
the whole the impact has been encouraging. The prime-time presentation of
Consenting Adults on a major network in 1985 is but one high-water mark in favorable media exposure of gay issues. But this should be
just the beginning of a major publicity blitz by gay America.
Would a desensitizing campaign of open and sustained talk about gay issues
reach every rabid opponent of homosexuality? Of course not.
While public opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious
authority is the other. When conservative churches condemn gays, there are only
two things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we
can use talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for gays
by more moderate churches, raising theological objections of our own about
conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and
inconsistency. Second, we can undermine the moral authority of homophobic
churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with
the times and with the latest findings of psychology. Against the mighty pull
of institutional Religion one must set the mightier draw of Science &
Public Opinion (the shield and sword of that accursed "secular
humanism"). Such an unholy alliance has worked well against churches
before, on such topics as divorce and abortion. With enough open talk about the
prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, that alliance can work again
here.
[2] PORTRAY GAYS AS VICTIMS,
NOT AS AGGRESSIVE CHALLENGERS.
In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of
protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of
protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and prideful tribe
promoting a rigidly nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, they are more likely
to be seen as a public menace that justifies resistance and oppression. For
that reason, we must forego the temptation to strut our "gay pride"
publicly when it conflicts with the Gay Victim image. And we must walk the fine
line between impressing straights with our great numbers, on the one hand, and
sparking their hostile paranoia-"They are all around us!"--on the other.
A media campaign to promote the Gay Victim image should make use of symbols which
reduce the mainstream's sense of threat, which lower it's
guard, and which enhance the plausibility of victimization. In practical terms,
this means that jaunty mustachioed musclemen would
keep very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations, while
sympathetic figures of nice young people, old people, and attractive women
would be featured. (It almost goes without saying that groups on the farthest
margin of acceptability such as NAMBLA, [Ed note -- North American Man-Boy Love
Association] must play no part at all in such a campaign: suspected
child-molesters will never look like victims.)
Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth
communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of
fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their
sexual preference. The message must read: "As far as gays can tell, they
were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright
or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and
are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully
contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have
happened to you!"
Straight viewers must be able to identify with gays as victims. Mr. and Mrs. Public must be given
no extra excuses to say, "they are not like
us." To this end, the persons featured in the public campaign should be
decent and upright, appealing and admirable by straight standards, completely
unexceptionable in appearance--in a word, they should be indistinguishable from
the straights we would like to reach. (To return to the terms we have used in
previous articles, spokesmen for our cause must be R-type "straight
gays" rather than Q-type "homosexuals on
display.") Only under such conditions will the message be read correctly:
"These folks are victims of a fate that could have happened to me."
By the way, we realize that many gays will question an advertising technique,
which might threaten to make homosexuality look like some dreadful disease,
which strikes fated "victims". But the plain fact is that the gay
community is weak and must manipulate the powers of the weak, including the
play for sympathy. In any case, we compensate for the negative aspect of this
gay victim appeal under Principle 4. (Below)
The second message would portray gays as victims of society. The straight
majority does not recognize the suffering it brings to the lives of gays and
must be shown: graphic pictures of brutalized gays; dramatizations of job and
housing insecurity, loss of child custody, and public humiliation: and the
dismal list goes on.
"... In any campaign to
win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection
so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of
protector."
[3] GIVE PROTECTORS A JUST
CAUSE.
A media campaign that casts
gays as society's victims and encourages straights to be their protectors must
make it easier for those to respond to assert and explain their new protectiveness. Few straight women, and even fewer straight men,
will want to defend homosexuality boldly as such. Most would rather attach
their awakened protective impulse to some principle of justice or law, to some
general desire for consistent and fair treatment in society. Our campaign
should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, should instead take
anti-discrimination as its theme. The right to free speech, freedom of beliefs,
freedom of association, due process and equal protection of laws-these should
be the concerns brought to mind by our campaign.
It is especially important for the gay movement to hitch its cause to accepted
standards of law and justice because its straight supporters must have at hand
a cogent reply to the moral arguments of its enemies. The homophobes clothe
their emotional revulsion in the daunting robes of religious dogma, so
defenders of gay rights must be ready to counter dogma with principle.
I will repeat again:
Anyone who ignores the clear teachings of the bible is either
ungodly or Godless or unbelieving.
At least for now, Fornicators and Adulterers,
are understanding enough, to respect the rights of others to hold and express
opposing viewpoints to their ungodly/unbiblical sexual practices.
It is the homosexual advocacy’s SUBTLE, but aggressive and
oppressive, tactics to silence EVERY opposition to same-sex sexual intercourse, whether religious or not, that is
creating this problem, of perceived discrimination and prejudice against
homosexuals, for our Country and for, increasingly, many other Countries of the
world.
Unless the practice of same-sex sexual intercourse is NOT encouraged/furthered, as the two instances recorded in the
bible clearly indicate, homosexuals will NEVER be
contented until they take over the whole Society/world, EVENTUALLY
resulting in the bullying/raping/destruction of non-homosexuals, and the inevitable
destruction of the Society/world.
Be rest assured that
when it comes to MORAL issues, the bible is VERY
CLEAR, both in the old and new testaments. It is the breaking of
God’s MORAL laws, if un-repented of, that DEFINITELY
damns a Soul to everlasting torments in hell-fire/lake of fire.
On NON-MORAL issues, the new
testament supersedes the old testament. Jesus Christ made it clear that
because of the hardness of our hearts God permitted some things in the Old testament; even then, God placed clear
guidelines to prevent/limit inhuman treatment:
Matthew 19:
7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command
to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
8 He saith unto
them, Moses because
of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it
was not so.
9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away
his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth
her which is put away doth commit adultery.
Exodus 21:
26 And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or
the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for
his eye’s sake.
27 And if he smite out his manservant’s tooth,
or his maidservant’s tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth’s sake.
God made it clear, through Moses, that the old
testament would not be the FINAL will/revelation
of God. God promised to send another PROPHET. Jesus said he is the promised
PROPHET.
Deuteronomy 18:
15 ¶ The
LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy
brethren, like unto me; unto
him ye shall hearken;
16 According to all that thou desiredst
of the LORD thy God in Horeb in the day of the
assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of the LORD my God, neither
let me see this great fire any more, that I die not.
17 And the LORD said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken.
18 I will raise them up a Prophet from among
their brethren, like unto thee, and will
put my words in his mouth;
and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
19 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever
will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.
John 5:
45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the
Father: there is one that accuseth you, even
Moses, in whom ye trust.
46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have
believed me: for he
wrote of me.
Under the new testament, through the
Lord Jesus Christ, God is able to give us a heart of flesh, hence you will NEVER find
any form of discrimination/prejudice in the new testament.
Ezekiel 36:
26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new
spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
2Corinthians 5:
17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all
things are become new.
I believe that no TRUE Bible-Believing Christian, whose understanding has been opened to understand the scriptures
(Luke
24:45 “Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the
scriptures”), justified apartheid or opposed the granting of civil rights to
black people; since It is obvious that the colour of our skin is NOT a moral issue; but same-sex
sexual intercourse is a moral issue, and it is CLEARLY condemned both in the old
and new testaments of the Bible:
Romans 1:
26 For
this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use
into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of
the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that
which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
The Bible does not in ANY WAY suggest
that the colour of a person’s skin could lead to hell-fire. The bible however,
makes it VERY CLEAR, that
same-sex sexual intercourse, if un-repented of, will SURELY lead
to the everlasting torment of such a Soul in hell-fire/lake of fire.
It is therefore, UNBIBLICAL to insist that the issue of encouraging and furthering same-sex
sexual intercourse should be treated the same way as the issue of the colour of our skin.
My God-given commission is to encourage/warn everyone to escape hell-fire,
so I will do all I can to make clear to everyone not to encourage nor further
the practice of same-sex sexual intercourse.
The Bible gives an example of Jonathan loving David as his own
soul, with a wonderful love, passing the love of women. Yet both Jonathan and
David are known to have married of the opposite gender. The
expression/manifestation of their love for each other did not involve same-sex
sexual intercourse; it did not involve same-sex marriage:
1Samuel 18:
1 ¶ And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking
unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.
2 And Saul took him that day, and would let him
go no more home to his father’s house.
3 Then Jonathan and David made a covenant,
because he loved him
as his own soul.
2Samuel 1:
26 I am distressed for thee, my brother
Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing
the love of women.
We must be very careful of what we label as LOVE.
God’s commandment that we should LOVE one another or LOVE our neighbour as our
self has no gender bias. So if a homosexual claims
that he/she loves one of same-sex, but does not have a similar love for anyone of the
opposite gender, to be able to marry one of opposite gender, it means he/she is
not manifesting/implying the type of LOVE that God commands; it means the
“love” he/she claims to have for the one of same-sex is an unbiblical love, an
untrue love, an ungodly love; in effect, it is not LOVE at all.
Again we must be very careful of what we label as LOVE
since God calls himself LOVE:
1John 4:
8 He that loveth not
knoweth not God; for God is love.
Any attempt to label the DESIRE for same-sex
sexual intercourse as LOVE, is blasphemy
against the God that is LOVE and who has made it very clear that same-sex
sexual intercourse is a vile affection, it
is against nature, it is unseemly/indecent, and it is an error that is being recompensed/punished:
Romans 1:
26 For
this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use
into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the
woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which
is unseemly,
and receiving in themselves that recompence of
their error
which was meet.
God, in His great love and mercy
towards us, has opted to give us the chance to repent and be forgiven and
be saved from the damnable consequences of our breaking his laws:
2Peter 3:
9 ¶ The
Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is
longsuffering to us–ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
God has warned us in the bible
that:
“Righteousness
exalteth a nation: but sin is a
reproach to any people.”(Proverbs
14:34)
“Woe unto
them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write
grievousness which they have prescribed”
(Isaiah 10:1)
It seems a choice has been made
to ignore/side-step, and instead label as pornographic, the clear evidence provided, AS FAR BACK AS November 1987, by Marshall Kirk and Erastes
Pill (THE OVERHAULING OF STRAIGHT AMERICA - http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm ):
1. That the homosexual advocacy claim, that the desire for same-sex sexual
intercourse is NOT at all a CHOICE but a birth condition, is simply a
strategy to manipulate public opinion.
2. That the homosexual
advocacy strategy of presenting gays as victims, not as aggressive
challengers of ESTABLISHED norms of the Society and the Christian
Religion, is simply intended to cause non-homosexuals to , by REFLEX,
assume the role of protectors. This again is a
manipulation of the emotions of Non-homosexuals.
3. That the homosexual
advocacy strategy of “First let the camel
get his nose inside the tent--only later his unsightly
derriere!” is a clear indication that there is more to the
homosexual lifestyle than the Public is being made to believe.
I still strongly believe that perceived discrimination and hatred
and prejudice could be better addressed through open dialogue and enforcement
of human right laws; and not through the encouragement to accept/yield to
ungodly sexual desires as the norm.
Whether we like to accept it or
not, the Bible has always been proved right EVENTUALLY.
Yielding to the manipulations
of the homosexual advocacy and ignoring God’s warning against encouraging and
furthering same-sex sexual intercourse will EVENTUALLY create a Society with a greatly increased risk of non-homosexual men
being bullied/raped/destroyed by
homosexual men; and this will inevitably
lead to the destruction of the Society.
It is indeed an irony, that
equality of marriage is planned to be achieved for gay people by legislating
different rules for heterosexual and homosexual marriages/partnership.
This is, of course, no real equality of marriage but rather, an eventual
prejudice is intended against non-homosexuals by imposing same-sex rules on
everyone in the future.
Marriage as presently defined is
EQUAL for all, in my opinion, true
orientations/birth conditions (having sexual intercourse, of ANY KIND, is
a CHOICE):
The law presently allows any consenting male and female that
are of age, to get married to each other. This does not at all forbid a
homosexual man from marrying a woman of his choice, and a homosexual woman from
marrying a man of her choice; and I believe there are such marriages in the
Society presently. So the State is not stopping gay, lesbian, or bisexual
from getting married. Rather, the State is being pressurised to re-define
marriage so that a male and a male can get married, and a female and a female
can get married; instead of the natural complementing situation
of a male and female getting married. Rather than making it clear that the real
issue at stake is marriage re-definition, the government is
presenting the viewpoint that it is denial of the right to
marriage/equality of marriage. This is simply a continued manifestation
of the subtlety of the homosexual advocacy.
Again:
Be rest assured that my interpretation of the Bible is
reliable and clear to any TRUE Bible-Believing Christian whose understanding
has been opened:
Luke 24:
45 Then opened he their understanding, that they
might understand the scriptures.
Many are making, like I wrote in
my communication with the Honourable Prime Minister, “the assumption
that all it will take for same-sex marriages to produce the benefits being
enjoyed from Male-Female marriages is for two same-sex individuals to sign
some documentation, make some vows before a gathering/Minister and have their
union branded as a marriage. This assumption is proved to be
false based on the two instances, recorded in the Bible, of nations/cities that
approved same-sex sexual intercourse. The eventual result, in
both instances, was a Society with a greatly increased risk of
non-homosexual men being bullied/raped/destroyed by homosexual
men.”
It is now obvious to some that the
real intent of the same-sex marriage law is NOT equality of marriage, but the
encouragement and furtherance of the practice of same-sex sexual intercourse,
by re-educating the Society, through the school system, that there is nothing
wrong with same-sex sexual intercourse; with the hope that this would address
the perceived discrimination and prejudice against gay people.
The homosexual advocacy’s
strategy of using the same-sex marriage law to get a legal basis, and access,
to re-educate the society, through the school system, that there is nothing
wrong with same-sex sexual intercourse, in-order to produce “a marked shift in attitudes
which would see measurable reductions in the prejudice and discrimination that gay people face”, will simply increase and , extend to the school place,
the present persecution against Bible-Believing Christians, and EVENTUALLY lead
to the wide-spread killing of Bible-Believing Christians in the society.
Perceived discrimination and
hatred and prejudice could be better addressed through open dialogue and
enforcement of human right laws; and not through the encouragement to
accept/yield to ungodly sexual desires as
the norm.
The fact that the two instances,
recorded in the Bible, of nations/cities that approved same-sex sexual
intercourse, eventually created, in BOTH instances, a
Society with a greatly increased risk of non-homosexual men
being bullied/raped/destroyed by homosexual men is sufficient evidence
for me, as a bible-believer, to alert every one of the INEVITABLE
and EVENTUAL
outcome of approving the same-sex marriage law that the government has
published.
Whenever God says the same thing twice, it means it is
impossible to have a different outcome:
Genesis: 41:
32 And for that the dream was doubled unto Pharaoh twice; it is because the thing is established by God, and God will shortly bring it to pass.
Deuteronomy 19:
15 One witness shall not rise up against a man
for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth:
at the mouth of two
witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.
The key word
here is “EVENTUALLY”, not immediately. The long term effect
of re-educating the Society, through our School System, to accept same-sex
sexual intercourse as OK, and even as “cool” – many celebrities, is
obvious, unless we choose to deceive ourselves: a new generation will be
born/taught/raised; the number of homosexuals will greatly increase; there will
be no stigmatising concept of adultery to help teach/restrain them to one
same-sex partner; they will get accustom to sex with multiple partners; eventually,
their pressurising influence in the Society will be so powerful, and their
sexual urge for a new willing/unwilling same-sex partner unrestrained
by God; bullying, raping and destruction will be inevitable.
We as a Nation have a CHOICE to either learn from what is written in the Bible, or
learn by experiencing the consequences of our ignoring the Word of God:
The Lord Jesus Christ says:
“the scripture CANNOT be broken”
(John 10:35b).
When Iby Knill, the
Holocaust survivor, said “What have I learned? What do I
know? I know that HUMAN CRUELTY KNOWS NO
BOUNDS” (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/the-northerner/2013/jan/28/holocaust-memorial-day-iby-knill-leeds
), she was simply saying, in different words, what the Bible says about the true
state/condition of the hearts of the fallen human race:
Jeremiah 17:
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Those that carried out the
holocaust against the Jews were civilised, and many of them were even
well-educated. Yet, before the world could do anything tangible millions,
including non-Jews, were dead.
Those that carried out the
inquisition against Bible-Believing Christians were civilised, and many of them
were well-educated and even religious. Yet, before the world could do anything
tangible millions, including non-Christians, were dead.
I am NOT accusing ANYONE of
being a potential rapist since it is pointless to accuse anyone of being a
potential rapist; were it not for the restraining grace of God upon our hearts,
our cruelty will know no bounds; and the more we ignore the Word of God, and
yield to our ungodly desires, the less God’s restraining grace will apply to
us:
Romans 1:
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their
knowledge, God gave
them over to a reprobate
mind, to do those
things which are not convenient;
29 Being filled with all unrighteousness,
fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder,
debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud,
boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers,
without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they
which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have
pleasure in them that do them.
Galatians 6:
7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for
whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
8 For he that soweth
to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life
everlasting.
Every large society will usually
have some fornicators in it.
Every large society will usually
have some adulterers in it.
Every large society will usually
have some homosexuals in it.
It will never be healthy for the
society if the government decides to encourage
and further the practice of fornication by compulsorily re-educating
the society, through the school system, that there is nothing wrong with
fornication.
It will never be healthy for the
society if the government decides to encourage
and further the practice of adultery by compulsorily re-educating the
society, through the school system, that there is nothing wrong with adultery.
It will never be healthy for the
society if the government decides to encourage
and further the practice of same-sex sexual intercourse by
compulsorily re-educating the society, through the school system, that there is
nothing wrong with same-sex sexual intercourse.
“Righteousness
exalteth a nation: but sin is a
reproach to any people.”(Proverbs
14:34)
We preach against fornication
(usually pre-marital sexual intercourse) between males and females,
at least for now, no one is advocating we are hating and discriminating
and prejudicing against the unmarried males and females.
We preach against adultery, at
least for now, no one is advocating we are hating and
discriminating and prejudicing against adulterers.
When we preach against same-sex
sexual intercourse, we are accused of hatred and discrimination and prejudice
against homosexuals.
Yet the bible makes it clear that
all three (fornication, adultery, same-sex sexual intercourse),and of course every SIN, if un-repented of, lead to
hellfire.
Continued efforts, by the
homosexual advocacy, to label biblical opposition to same-sex sexual intercourse
as a discrimination and a prejudice against gay people, will definitely
increase the present persecution against bible-believing Christians, and EVENTUALLY
lead to their widespread killing in the Society; since history has shown, again
and again, that it is IMPOSSIBLE to get ALL true bible-believing Christians to CONSISTENTLY
act against their religious conscience, and every effort, by authorities, to
achieve such an aim has led to widespread persecution and killing of
bible-believing Christians. The historical persecution of Bible-Believing
Christians, simply for their opposition to ungodly/unbiblical practices, is
well detailed in the Fox’s Book of Martyrs (http://www.ccel.org/f/foxe/martyrs/home.html
), and also foretold in the Scriptures. It will not be in the interest of our
Nation if we sow the seed for such history to repeat itself:
Matthew 24:
9 Then shall they deliver you up to be
afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.
2Timothy 3:
12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.
The Lord Jesus Christ says:
“the scripture cannot
be broken” (John 10:35b)
If with a homosexual population of less than 7% of the Society,
the homosexual advocacy’s pressurising
influence is already being felt by virtually every segment of the Society, it
will surely
be too costly for us, and most especially for our Children and subsequent
generations, if we fail to learn from the Bible that same-sex sexual
intercourse practices, if encouraged and furthered by the Government, would EVENTUALLY create a Society with a greatly increased risk of non-homosexual men
being bullied/raped/destroyed by
homosexual men; and this will inevitably
lead to the destruction of the Society:
Genesis 19:
4 ¶ But before they lay down, the
men of the city, even the men of
Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the
people from every quarter:
5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which
came in to thee this night? bring them out
unto us, that we may know them.
9 And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs
be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed
sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the
door.
24 ¶ Then the LORD rained upon
Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;
25 And he overthrew those cities,
and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew
upon the ground.
Judges 19: 22 ¶ Now as they were making their hearts merry,
behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about,
and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house,
the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may
know him.
Judges 20:
12 ¶ And the tribes of Israel sent
men through all the tribe of Benjamin, saying, What wickedness is this
that is done among you?
13 Now therefore deliver us
the men, the children of Belial, which are in Gibeah,
that we may put them to death, and put away evil from Israel. But the children
of Benjamin would not hearken to the voice of their brethren the children of
Israel:
14 But the children of Benjamin
gathered themselves together out of the cities unto Gibeah,
to go out to battle against the children of Israel.
48 And the men of Israel turned
again upon the children of Benjamin, and smote them with the edge of the sword,
as well the men of every city, as the beast, and all that came to hand:
also they set on fire all the cities that they came to.
I believe God allowed these two instances to be recorded
in the bible so that we could learn that same-sex sexual intercourse practices,
if encouraged and furthered by the Government, would EVENTUALLY create a Society with a greatly increased risk of non-homosexual men
being bullied/raped/destroyed by
homosexual men; and this will inevitably
lead to the destruction of the Society:
Romans
15:
4 For whatsoever things were written aforetime
were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might
have hope.
Even if the
bullies/rapists/murderers are punished, that will not undo the
physical/psychological/emotional defilement or hurt or destruction done to the
person that is bullied/raped/destroyed.
Our living in the 21st
Century will not justify attempts to change God-ordained
laws/institutions, since the bible makes it clear that the word of God endures forever:
1Peter 1:
24 ¶ For all flesh
is as grass, and all
the glory of man as the flower of
grass. The grass withereth,
and the flower thereof falleth away:
25 But the word of the Lord endureth
for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.
Every human being is entitled
to his/her choices (even though choices have consequences) but, whether we
believe it or not, we all are ultimately accountable to God:
Acts
5:
29 Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
“every one of
us shall give account of himself to God (Romans 14:12b)”